Skip to content
LIVE
WAR & GEOPOLITICS US Deportees Held in Nightmare Hotel in Equatorial Guinea — 80% verified      SPORTS Chelsea Struggle Without Joao Pedro as Defense and Attack Both Falter — 80% verified      TOP STORIES Trump Bars CNN, MSNBC, Politico From White House Access — 54% verified      WAR & GEOPOLITICS Tennessee Woman Sues Fargo Police Over AI Facial Recognition Bank Theft Arrest — 80% verified      SPORTS Brentford Beat Chelsea 3-0 With Three Second-Half Goals — 82% verified      TOP STORIES Trump: Russian Oligarch Funding Son’s Wedding Party ‘Totally Allowed’ — 50% verified      TRADING & CRYPTO ECB’s Lagarde Said to Block Binance EU License, WSJ Reports — 76% verified      SPORTS Carrick Dismisses Future Questions as United Coach Stays Focused — 82% verified      ECONOMY & MARKETS Anthropic Selects Accenture as First AI Safety Evaluator — 80% verified      WAR & GEOPOLITICS Uber Ordered to Pay $40M Over Death of Woman Kicked from Driver Car — 80% verified      WAR & GEOPOLITICS US Deportees Held in Nightmare Hotel in Equatorial Guinea — 80% verified      SPORTS Chelsea Struggle Without Joao Pedro as Defense and Attack Both Falter — 80% verified      TOP STORIES Trump Bars CNN, MSNBC, Politico From White House Access — 54% verified      WAR & GEOPOLITICS Tennessee Woman Sues Fargo Police Over AI Facial Recognition Bank Theft Arrest — 80% verified      SPORTS Brentford Beat Chelsea 3-0 With Three Second-Half Goals — 82% verified      TOP STORIES Trump: Russian Oligarch Funding Son’s Wedding Party ‘Totally Allowed’ — 50% verified      TRADING & CRYPTO ECB’s Lagarde Said to Block Binance EU License, WSJ Reports — 76% verified      SPORTS Carrick Dismisses Future Questions as United Coach Stays Focused — 82% verified      ECONOMY & MARKETS Anthropic Selects Accenture as First AI Safety Evaluator — 80% verified      WAR & GEOPOLITICS Uber Ordered to Pay $40M Over Death of Woman Kicked from Driver Car — 80% verified     
Saturday, September 19, 2026
Updated 7 minutes ago
AI-Verified Global News Intelligence
AI MONITORING ACTIVE
7,907 articles published
Top Stories 80% VERIFIED

Critics call Blanche deal hollow as Trump slush fund halted

Critics say the agreement between acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and two Republican senators is weak and lets the president reverse its commitments easily.
Top Stories · August 4, 2026 · 2 months ago · 4 min read · AI Summary · The Guardian
80 / 100
AI Credibility Assessment
High Credibility
AI VERIFIED 0/3 claims verified 1 sources cited
Source Corroboration 30%
Source Tier Quality 70%
Claim Verification 40%
Source Recency 90%

Single-source rewrite; limited independent verification

Critics have labeled the agreement between acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and two Republican senators as ‘completely hollow,’ saying it does little to stop a Trump‑linked slush fund and can be easily undone by the president.

The deal, which Democrats say clears the way for Blanche’s confirmation as attorney general, involves Blanche withdrawing an May 18 order that would have created a $1.8 billion weaponization fund and clarifying that a Justice Department tax immunity granted to Trump applies only retroactively to the president, his sons and their businesses.

Democrats and several experts argue that the promises made in the compromise are weak and that President Trump could reverse them at will, rendering the arrangement ineffective.

Key Facts

  • Democrats say the agreement clears the way for Blanche’s confirmation and makes promises the president can easily reverse.
  • Critics call the Blanche‑senator compromise weak, saying it lets Trump reverse promises easily.
  • Blanche withdrew an 18 May order for a $1.8 bn weaponization fund and clarified Trump’s tax immunity applies only retroactively.

What the Blanche deal entails

According to the source, Todd Blanche, who is the acting attorney general, posted two documents on Sunday evening. The documents show he is withdrawing an order dated May 18 that had authorized the creation of a $1.8 billion weaponization fund. The same documents also clarify that a broad tax immunity previously granted by the Justice Department to Donald Trump applies only in a retroactive manner to the president, his sons, and their businesses. The source notes that this agreement is described as clearing the path for Blanche’s confirmation to the attorney general post.

Critics’ concerns

Democrats and several experts quoted in the source characterize the compromise as weak. They argue that the promises contained in the agreement are easily reversible by President Trump, which undermines any substantive restraint on a potential slush fund. The source does not provide any additional detail about the exact mechanisms of reversal, but stresses that the critics view the deal as offering little lasting protection against the president’s ability to undo the commitments.

What happens next?

The source does not outline specific future steps regarding the Blanche deal or the confirmation process. It notes that the agreement is intended to facilitate Blanche’s confirmation as attorney general, but does not state when any vote might occur. The source also highlights that, according to critics, President Trump retains the ability to reverse the promises made in the agreement at any time, leaving the outcome uncertain.

What We Know — and What We Don’t

Verified by the source:

  • Democrats say the agreement clears the way for Blanche’s confirmation and makes promises the president can easily reverse.
  • The compromise involves Todd Blanche and two Republican senators.
  • Blanche withdrew an 18 May order for a $1.8 bn weaponization fund.
  • The documents clarify that Trump’s tax immunity applies only retroactively to the president, his sons, and businesses.
  • Critics describe the deal as weak and say Trump can easily reverse its promises.

Still unconfirmed:

  • Whether President Trump will actually reverse the commitments outlined in the deal.
  • The exact timing or outcome of Blanche’s confirmation vote.
  • If any further legal or congressional actions will be taken regarding the weaponization fund or tax immunity.

Why It Matters

The agreement touches on checks and balances between the executive branch and the Department of Justice, raising questions about how easily presidential directives can be altered or undone. Readers concerned about the independence of federal law enforcement and the potential use of funds for politically motivated purposes will find the debate relevant to broader discussions about accountability and the limits of presidential power.

What to Watch

Watch for any confirmation proceedings for Todd Blanche and for public statements or actions from the president that might affect the weaponization fund or tax immunity provisions.

Community Verdict — Do you trust this story?
Be the first to vote on this story.