Charles Perrottet has denied asking his brother, then-NSW premier Dominic Perrottet, to appoint a cabinet minister to secure outcomes for property developer Jean Nassif, according to testimony at the Independent Commission Against Corruption (Icac). The claims were allegedly made in an intercepted phone call where Nassif referred to Dominic Perrottet as “my boy” shortly before he became premier.
Key Facts
- Charles Perrottet denied allegations he asked his brother to appoint a cabinet minister for developer Jean Nassif
- The claims emerged from an intercepted phone call featuring Nassif days before Dominic Perrottet became NSW premier
- Nassif allegedly described Dominic Perrottet as “my boy” in the call
- Charles Perrottet stated these claims did not reflect any promises to Nassif
- The testimony was heard during an Icac inquiry into potential corruption
The Story
The allegations center around whether Charles Perrottet sought to influence his brother’s cabinet appointments to benefit a property developer. Charles Perrottet’s testimony directly contradicted claims alleged to have been made in intercepted communications involving developer Jean Nassif.
What was said in the phone call?
The intercepted call reportedly contained Nassif’s statements about “reshuffling the government” and referring to Dominic Perrottet in familiar terms. Charles Perrottet testified these statements didn’t reflect actual promises or agreements between the parties. The Icac inquiry is examining potential improper influence in government appointments.
What We Know — and What We Don’t
Verified by the source:
- Charles Perrottet denied the allegations under oath at Icac
- The claims originated from an intercepted phone call featuring Jean Nassif
- The call occurred days before Dominic Perrottet became premier
Still unconfirmed:
- The exact content and context of the intercepted phone call
- Whether there were any actual attempts to influence cabinet appointments
- The nature of any relationship between Nassif and the Perrottets
Why It Matters
This testimony forms part of a broader corruption inquiry into potential improper influence in government affairs. The integrity of political appointments and decision-making processes remains a key concern for public trust in government institutions.
What To Watch
The Icac inquiry will continue examining evidence related to these allegations, with further testimony and findings expected. The commission’s final determination could have implications for understanding potential influence in political appointments. For ongoing coverage of Australian politics and anti-corruption efforts, follow our Australia news.