A new study has accused the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), known for its ‘blue tick’ sustainability certification, of creating a misleading impression of ethical sourcing by allegedly overlooking labor abuses in certified seafood supply chains. Researchers found that 20% of vessels reporting crew abuses to the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) over the past five years were MSC-approved, sparking debates about the integrity of sustainability labels.
The MSC, a globally recognized certification body, promotes its blue tick as assurance that seafood is sourced sustainably. However, critics argue the label fails to address human rights violations, including forced labor and unsafe working conditions. ‘Sustainability shouldn’t just be about fish stocks; it must include fair treatment of workers,’ said a maritime labor analyst familiar with the study.
In response, MSC officials stated their certification focuses on environmental standards but acknowledged the need for ‘broader ethical considerations.’ The organization has faced mounting pressure to integrate social accountability into its assessments. Industry experts warn that without reform, consumer trust in eco-labels could erode.
The findings coincide with growing scrutiny of labor practices in global fisheries. Advocacy groups urge regulators to mandate human rights due diligence alongside environmental criteria. ‘Certifications can’t turn a blind eye to exploitation,’ emphasized an ITF spokesperson. The study’s implications may reshape how sustainability is defined in seafood sourcing.